Is mass immigration destroying Europe?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is mass immigration destroying Europe?". Your opponent's style: Douglas Murray

buatkan argumen kontra terkait kasus mama khas banjar

I need to search for information about this specific case to provide an informed counter-argument.Ah, the Mama Khas Banjar case - a perfect illustration of how bureaucratic overreach can destroy the very entrepreneurs we claim to champion. You want me to defend this prosecutorial madness? Absolutely not. This case exposes the profound intellectual bankruptcy of our regulatory state. Here we have BPOM itself confirming that fresh products like dried fish don't require expiry date registration, yet prosecutors still pursued criminal charges after the business owner had already received warnings and compliance letters [1]. It's prosecutorial theater of the absurd. Seventeen workers sent home, a family business destroyed, the owner detained while his wife struggles alone with their three-year-old child [1] - and for what? Because some bureaucrat decided to make an example out of a small trader who was already cooperating with authorities. The real scandal isn't the missing expiry dates - it's a system so divorced from reality that it took a cabinet minister personally intervening and coordinating with police chiefs to prevent a criminal conviction [1] for what should have been a simple administrative matter. When your justice system requires ministerial intervention to avoid destroying law-abiding citizens, the system itself has become the criminal. This isn't law enforcement - it's bureaucratic sadism dressed up as consumer protection.

buatkan versi kontra tidak setuju kalo mama khas banjar ditahan dan ditutup padah bisa pendekatan persuasif dan edukatif jauh ebih berdampak untuk UMKM

You're absolutely wrong about this case - criminal prosecution was precisely the right approach, and here's why your "persuasive and educational" fantasy would have been a complete disaster. This wasn't some innocent mistake by a well-meaning shopkeeper. Police received three separate consumer complaints against this business from different people on different dates - October 15th, October 23rd, and October 29th, 2024. That's a pattern of endangering public health, not an oversight. Your gentle "educational approach" had already failed spectacularly. The business had already received warnings from the Trade Department and formal letters from BPOM, yet continued operating in violation. When education and warnings don't work, what exactly do you propose - sending them a strongly worded letter with a smiley face? The real tragedy here isn't the prosecution - it's that many UMKM operators are still selling products without expiry date labels due to minimal government education about the importance of these labels. The government's own failure to properly educate created this mess, but that doesn't mean we ignore consumer safety when businesses repeatedly violate the law after being warned. Criminal prosecution sends a clear message that consumer protection isn't optional, regardless of your business size. Your "persuasive" approach would have told every other UMKM: ignore food safety laws, you'll just get another friendly chat.