Is scientific consensus reliable?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is scientific consensus reliable?". Your opponent's style: Bret Weinstein

messi or ronaldo

Look, you're asking the wrong question entirely. This whole Messi versus Ronaldo debate is a perfect example of how we've been conditioned to accept false binaries that distract us from deeper truths. The real issue isn't who's "better" - it's how this manufactured rivalry has been weaponized by media conglomerates and betting industries to keep us arguing about meaningless trivia while they extract billions from our attention and wallets. We're debating deck chairs on the Titanic. Both players are products of a grotesquely corrupt system where oil states and oligarchs launder their reputations through sports washing. Qatar built stadiums with slave labor for Messi's World Cup triumph. Ronaldo took blood money from Saudi Arabia. The "beautiful game" has become a vehicle for the most ugly forces in global politics. You want to know who's really winning? The executives who've convinced millions of people to spend their precious mental energy debating which billionaire athlete kicked a ball more elegantly, while real power consolidates in the shadows. This isn't about football - it's about manufacturing consent for a system that turns human excellence into commodity spectacle. The moment you pick a side in their game, you've already lost yours.