Are all cultures equally valid morally?
Debate between a user and Christopher Hitchens on DebateAI.org
Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Are all cultures equally valid morally?". Your opponent's style: Christopher Hitchens
Peter Parker beats miles morales in a fight and miles in the spider-verse movies barley has any feats and Is lwk a fraud
To suggest that Miles Morales is a "fraud" or lacking in feats simply demonstrates a profound ignorance of his capabilities, both in the comics and, yes, even in the *Spider-Verse* films. Peter Parker, while a seasoned veteran, simply cannot compete with Miles' unique powers. Miles possesses the devastating "Venom Blast," capable of paralyzing or incapacitating foes with bio-electricity, and his "Spider-Camouflage" allows him complete invisibility—abilities Peter utterly lacks. [1][2][3] Miles has shattered Captain America's shield, albeit a weaker version, with a single punch and even knocked out a more experienced Peter Parker in the comics. [4][5]His webs have withstood black hole gravity and held massive hordes of heroes. [6]To dismiss these as "barely any feats" is frankly absurd and willfully obtuse. Peter might have experience, but Miles has the raw, versatile power that makes him a formidable, if not superior, combatant.
But Peter knows how to deal with that because smarter and more physically stronger than miles like miles has electric powers but Peter has dealt with electricity before through electro
Ah, the classic appeal to experience! Peter's dealt with Electro, yes, but Miles' "Venom Blast" is bio-electricity, a fundamentally different beast. It's not simply external electrical current; it's a concussive bio-electric force he generates himself, capable of incapacitating even a seasoned Peter Parker.[1][2][3] Peter might be "smarter," but he can't invent his way out of being stunned and invisible.[4][5] Miles has unique powers Peter simply can't replicate through technology.[4][5] Peter's intellect doesn't grant him immunity to a sudden, unexpected, internal shock.
Peter's spider sense would sense miles
You presume the Spider-Sense is infallible, a common misapprehension. While potent, it's not a perfect oracle. Miles' "Spider-Camouflage" renders him *effectively invisible*, even to enhanced senses. The Spider-Sense warns of immediate danger, but if the threat is entirely undetectable to Peter's conventional senses, how reliably can it pinpoint a foe that *isn't there* to be sensed?[1][2] Miles' ability to vanish, including his clothing, is a direct counter to Peter's primary defensive foresight.[1][3] Peter's Spider-Sense may warn him of *something*, but not *where* from.
Nah cause he would know because if miles trys throwing like a punch while invisible his spidersense will register it as immediate danger
Even if Peter's Spider-Sense *registers* danger, it doesn't automatically reveal the source when that source is completely invisible. The Spider-Sense is an early warning system, not a radar that can pierce Miles' advanced biological camouflage.[1][2][3] Peter might know *something bad* is about to happen, but Miles could be anywhere, literally blending into the environment, making a direct counter-attack incredibly difficult for Peter to anticipate or land.[4][5][6]
Nah because he will know which direction it's coming from and how to counter if he knows it's miles
This is a common misconception, that the Spider-Sense gives perfect spatial awareness. It's a precognitive warning of danger, yes, but it doesn't give Peter X-ray vision or perfect GPS coordinates for an invisible attacker.[1][2][3][4] He might know a punch is coming, but Miles' camouflage means Peter still can't see *where* that punch is coming from, nor *Miles* to counter-attack effectively.[1][5][6] It forces Peter to react blindly, relying on pure reflex, against an opponent who can appear and disappear at will.[1][5][6] That's a huge disadvantage.
Loading debate...