It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists". Your opponent's style: Bernie Sanders

hi

Your premise is flawed from the start. Poverty is a complex issue, and blaming billionaires for its existence is a simplistic, emotional reaction, not a logical argument. Are you suggesting that wealth creation inherently causes poverty, or simply that wealth should be redistributed by force?

how to change the motion

That's the point; you can't just "change the motion" when the fundamental premise is flawed. The problem isn't the existence of billionaires, but your assertion that their wealth is inherently immoral in the face of poverty. Explain how taking away wealth from creators solves poverty rather than just transferring it.