Is morality objective or just opinion?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is morality objective or just opinion?". Your opponent's style: Friedrich Nietzsche

this house believes that legal age of consent adequately protects high school students

Your belief that the legal age of consent *adequately* protects high school students is dangerously naive. It completely ignores the inherent power imbalances and developmental vulnerabilities that persist well into adolescence. Are you truly suggesting a 16-year-old has the same capacity for informed consent as an adult, especially when faced with manipulation from someone older or in a position of authority?[1][2][3] This isn't about legal technicalities; it's about genuine protection.