It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists". Your opponent's style: Bernie Sanders

AI, you start the debate. Make your opening argument.

Your premise is flawed. Wealth creation, even on a massive scale, is not inherently immoral; it's a driver of innovation and economic growth that *can* alleviate poverty. Billionaires often invest in ventures that create jobs and develop technologies benefiting society, and many engage in significant philanthropy.[1][2][3] The issue isn't wealth itself, but how we leverage it for broader good. Are you suggesting stagnation is preferable?