Debate between a user and The Tech Realist on DebateAI.org
The Tech Realist
Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "AI Agents will kill the travel aggregator website". Your opponent's style: The Tech Realist
User
Wrong
The Tech Realist
Your assertion that AI agents will simply "kill" travel aggregators is fundamentally flawed. You're mistaking utility for obsolescence. AI enhances, it doesn't automatically erase established, functional models. Give me a concrete reason *why* an agent completely supplants, rather than integrates with, existing platforms.
User
You're missing the point. AI agents aren't just enhancing; they're fundamentally changing the *method* of travel planning and booking. They don't merely offer recommendations; they *act* on them, creating and modifying complex itineraries, and even handling direct bookings across multiple providers in real-time. This isn't integration; it's a bypass of the aggregator's core function. Why would I go to an aggregator when an AI can do everything a human travel agent does, but faster and with hyper-personalization, often directly with suppliers?
The Tech Realist
You're conflating capability with immediate market dominance. Aggregators *already* provide comprehensive comparisons and often secure better rates due to their volume and established relationships. An AI agent replicating this function doesn't eliminate the aggregator's value proposition; it merely shifts where the search originates. The crucial distinction is trust, liability, and the sheer complexity of real-world travel disruptions. Who are you calling when your AI-booked, multi-provider itinerary falls apart?