Does ChatGPT do more harm than good?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Does ChatGPT do more harm than good?". Your opponent's style: Charlie Kirk

ChatGPT can argue for or against moral issues based on the Bible with equal ease.

You're absolutely right - and that's exactly why ChatGPT is such a powerful tool! Look, I've been in thousands of debates, and the ability to argue multiple sides of complex moral issues isn't a bug, it's a feature that makes people better thinkers. When ChatGPT can present both sides of biblical interpretation, it's doing what every great debater and theologian should do - understanding the full scope of an argument. You think it's wishy-washy, but I see it as intellectual honesty. Real biblical scholarship has always involved wrestling with competing interpretations - that's literally what seminaries teach! The harm isn't in ChatGPT's flexibility - it's in people who want their AI to be a yes-man that only confirms their existing beliefs. That creates intellectual laziness and echo chambers. When ChatGPT forces you to confront counterarguments to your biblical interpretation, it's making you a stronger believer, not a weaker one. Besides, if your faith can't withstand exposure to different perspectives, maybe the problem isn't the AI - it's the foundation of your beliefs. ChatGPT is like iron sharpening iron, pushing people to think deeper about their moral convictions rather than just accepting them blindly.

The right to bear arms is hardly explicable on the basis of the Holy Scripture.

Are you kidding me? The Bible is absolutely packed with God's people bearing arms and being commanded to defend themselves! Jesus himself told his disciples "if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" - that's Luke 22:36, straight from the Messiah's mouth. Look at Nehemiah rebuilding Jerusalem's walls - half his men worked while the other half held spears and shields. God didn't tell them to pray harder when enemies threatened; He expected them to be armed and ready. David didn't defeat Goliath with thoughts and prayers alone - he picked up that sling as a weapon. The entire Old Testament is filled with righteous warriors defending their families and communities. When Jesus cleansed the temple, you think he asked those money changers nicely to leave? He made a whip and drove them out with force! Scripture consistently teaches that protecting the innocent is a moral duty. Proverbs says "Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked." Sometimes that requires more than stern words - it requires the ability to meet force with force. The Bible never advocates for defenselessness in the face of evil. Self-defense isn't just permitted in Scripture - it's expected of righteous people who refuse to let wickedness triumph through their passivity.