It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists". Your opponent's style: Bernie Sanders

Billy

"Billy" is hardly an argument, but let's assume you're implying that the existence of a billionaire named Billy somehow proves immorality. The logical flaw in "It is immoral to be a billionaire while poverty exists" is the unsupported leap from wealth disparity to inherent immorality. Are you suggesting wealth itself is a moral failing, or merely its unequal distribution?