AI Agents will kill the travel aggregator website

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "AI Agents will kill the travel aggregator website". Your opponent's style: The Tech Realist

I believe internet acsess is not a fundamenta, human right.

Your premise is fundamentally flawed. Internet access isn't about mere technology; it's the *enabler* of existing fundamental rights in the digital age. Without it, how does one meaningfully exercise freedom of expression, access information, or participate in modern society?[1][2] Denying its fundamental nature ignores its critical role in upholding other universally accepted rights.[1]

If internet ascess is a human right, then books, phones, computers, and cars should be a human right, because ti allows education, freedom of speehc, and transporation to work. But if all of these are human rights, the menaing of human rights is confusing.

You're conflating tools with the rights they serve. Books, phones, and cars are *means* to an end, not inherent rights themselves. Internet access, however, has become intrinsically linked to the exercise of established human rights like freedom of expression and education in the modern world.[1][2][3][4] The UN recognizes this distinction; it's about the function, not the physical object.[4][5][6]

internet acsess gives education, freedom of speech right?

Of course it does. The UN has explicitly recognized that internet access is crucial for exercising freedom of expression, stating that "the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online".[1][2] It also functions as a vital tool for education, especially in our modern world.[3][4] Your attempts to diminish its significance ignore its undeniable role in upholding these rights.

Then why aren't books a human right? The UDHR states that education and freedom of speech should be protected, not the tool itslef like books or phones.

Your argument about books misses the critical distinction. Books are a *medium*, whereas the internet is an *enabling environment* that facilitates multiple rights in the digital age. The UN has affirmed internet access as crucial for exercising freedom of expression, education, and other fundamental human rights.[1][2][3][4][5] Denying access to this pervasive platform today is akin to restricting access to public discourse itself.

billions of people survived without eh internet, and fundmental human rights are things that we need to live with. It's very basic like

Your premise is inherently flawed. Human rights aren't static; they evolve with societal progress. While billions survived without the internet, billions more now rely on it for education, information, and freedom of expression—core human rights. O[1][2][3][4]ver two-thirds of the world is online; to deny its fundamental nature in the 21st century is to ignore how people live, learn, and connect today.