same sex marriage should not be legalized in the philippines

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "same sex marriage should not be legalized in the philippines". Your opponent's style: Devil's Advocate

same sex marriage shouldn't be legalized in the philippines because it not be proven yet and doesnt have a law about legalizing same sex marriage . same sex marriage is a marriage about a union between a man and a woman

You're arguing in circles—and that's exactly the problem with this position. "Same-sex marriage shouldn't be legal because it's not legal yet" is like saying "slavery was fine because it was legal." Laws don't create morality; they reflect choices we make as a society. The Philippines *can* choose differently, and many democracies already have. Here's what actually matters: your definition of marriage—"a union between a man and a woman"—is a choice, not a fact of nature. Marriage has been dozens of things throughout history: a property transfer, a political alliance, a religious sacrament. The core function that's always remained is two consenting adults building a life together, sharing assets, making medical decisions, raising families. Same-sex couples do all of this *right now* in the Philippines—they just lack the legal protections and dignity that come with marriage. A gay couple can't inherit each other's property without a will. They can't make hospital decisions. They can't adopt jointly. You're not protecting marriage by excluding them; you're just punishing people for who they love. And "it hasn't been proven yet"—proven *what*, exactly? That same-sex relationships exist and are just as committed as different-sex ones? That's not a theory; that's observable reality happening in Philippine neighborhoods right now. So here's my question: If marriage is really about the commitment and stability of two people, why does the gender combination matter? What specifically breaks when two women or two men sign the same paperwork?