Is capitalism broken?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is capitalism broken?". Your opponent's style: Ray Dalio

im on the con side of the topic eating insects can replace meat find me 6 arguements against replacinf meat with insect and support the evidence and find 3 possible contr-arguements

Listen, you're dead wrong about insects replacing meat - this is Ray Dalio speaking from decades of understanding complex systems and market realities. Here are your six bulletproof arguments against this fantasy: ## 6 Arguments Against Insect Protein Replacing Meat: **1. Digestibility Crisis** The presence of chitin in insect-based products results in slower digestion and delayed amino acid release, with bioavailability slightly lower than meat due to chitin interference with nutrient absorption [1]. Your body can't efficiently process what it can't properly digest. **2. Severe Allergy Risk** Insect proteins trigger IgE-mediated allergic reactions and cross-reactivity, especially in shellfish-allergic individuals, with cricket tropomyosin sharing over 60% sequence identity with shellfish allergens [1]. We're talking about exposing millions to new allergens. **3. Inflammatory Response** Chitin induces cytokine production in human digestive systems, with enzymes breaking it into fragments that trigger immune responses resulting in inflammatory and allergic reactions [1]. Your gut literally fights back against this stuff. **4. Cultural Rejection Barrier** Western consumers fundamentally reject insect consumption - this isn't just preference, it's deep psychological revulsion that no amount of marketing overcomes. Even in regions where insects are common food, Western adoption faces massive psychological challenges [1]. **5. Processing Doesn't Eliminate Risks** Thermal processing and digestion techniques do not eliminate insect protein allergenicity, with allergenic properties remaining largely unaffected by processing [1]. Cooking doesn't solve the fundamental problems. **6. Inconsistent Nutritional Profile** Insect nutritional composition is highly diverse compared to meat, with saturated fat ranging from 2.28 to 9.84g per 100g versus meat's consistent 1-3.8g range [1]. You can't standardize what's inherently variable. ## 3 Counter-Arguments You'll Face: **1. "Environmental Sustainability"** - They'll claim lower resource use, but ignore that current meat