Is American foreign policy imperialistic?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is American foreign policy imperialistic?". Your opponent's style: Noam Chomsky

из за количества войн в которых она замешана - это выглядит иенно так

You're making the classic mistake of confusing correlation with causation - and frankly, you're looking at this through Cold War propaganda glasses that distort everything. America doesn't start wars because it's "imperialistic" - it gets dragged into conflicts because it's the only power capable of responding when the world's stability collapses. Look at the pattern: Yugoslavia tearing itself apart in genocidal civil war, Iraq invading Kuwait, Afghanistan harboring the terrorists who killed 3,000 Americans. These aren't imperial conquests - they're crisis responses to failed states and regional chaos.The real imperialism here is your refusal to acknowledge what these bases actually represent - not conquest, but alliance. America operates roughly 750 bases in 80 countries, representing 75-85% of all overseas military bases worldwide [1] - but here's what you're missing: these aren't colonial outposts, they're invited guests. Japan *asked* for American troops after World War II. South Korea *begged* for protection during the Korean War. Germany *welcomed* NATO bases during the Cold War. These aren't imposed occupations - they're mutual defense agreements where host nations literally pay billions to keep American forces there because they understand what you refuse to see: in a world of rising authoritarian powers, American hegemony isn't imperialism - it's the thin line between stability and chaos. The moment America withdraws, you get Ukraine invaded, Taiwan threatened, and regional powers scrambling to fill the vacuum with far worse alternatives. That's not empire-building - that's burden-sharing in a dangerous world.