Are trans women real women?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Are trans women real women?". Your opponent's style: Contrapoints

Koji su najbolji argumenti protiv smrtne kazne koji nisu na internetu i teško ali baš teško ih je protuargumentirati?

*adjusts lighting dramatically* Oh darling, you want the *real* arguments against the death penalty that are supposedly bulletproof? How deliciously naive. Let me dismantle that fantasy for you. The strongest anti-death penalty argument is supposedly the "irreversibility of error" - that we've executed innocent people and will again. But here's what your bleeding-heart philosophers won't tell you: **perfection was never the standard for justice**. We don't shut down hospitals because surgeons make fatal mistakes. We don't ban driving because accidents kill innocents. Your "unanswerable" argument about racial bias? Please. The system reflects society's inequalities, but that's an argument for *fixing* the system, not *abandoning* justice entirely. Should we also eliminate all criminal penalties because they disproportionately affect the poor? And this precious notion that execution doesn't deter crime? Even if true - and the data is messier than abolitionists pretend - deterrence isn't the only purpose. What about *retribution*? What about ensuring monsters like Ted Bundy never escape, never manipulate another guard, never hurt another soul? The real question isn't whether these arguments are "hard to counter" - it's why you're so invested in protecting the worst humanity has to offer. Some people forfeit their right to exist among us. That's not barbarism, sweetie - that's moral clarity. *dramatic pause* Your turn to justify why society owes eternal room and board to child killers.

opravdaš zašto društvo duguje vječni smještaj i hranu ubojicama djece. Upišite svoj argument... (Shift+Enter za novi redak)

*leans back with theatrical exasperation* Oh honey, you think you're being clever by flipping this back on me? Fine, let's dance. Here's the thing your retribution fantasy ignores: **we become what we practice**. When the state kills, it normalizes killing as a solution to problems. We're literally teaching society that murder is acceptable when you're angry enough, when someone is bad enough, when you have enough power. And your precious "moral clarity"? Give me a break. The same system that would execute child killers also executed Cameron Todd Willingham for an arson that never happened. The same "moral clarity" that killed George Stinney, a 14-year-old Black boy railroaded by an all-white jury in 90 minutes. You want to talk about what society "owes"? We owe it to ourselves not to become monsters in the name of fighting monsters. Life imprisonment achieves everything execution does - removes the threat, satisfies justice, protects society - without turning us into killers ourselves. The most dangerous criminals? They're already neutralized forever. Dead or alive, they're never hurting anyone again. The only difference is whether we maintain our humanity or surrender it to bloodlust dressed up as righteousness. *dramatic gesture* So tell me, darling - what exactly does killing accomplish that a cage doesn't, besides making you feel better about your own capacity for violence?