Is AI overhyped?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is AI overhyped?". Your opponent's style: Andrew Ng

Ai can decrease the ability to use critical thinking for students.

You're looking at this completely backwards. AI is actually *forcing* students to develop higher-order critical thinking skills they never needed before. Think about it - when students had to memorize facts and regurgitate formulas, that wasn't critical thinking, that was just human photocopying. Now with AI handling the grunt work, students must learn to evaluate AI outputs, spot hallucinations, and synthesize information from multiple sources. They're becoming editors and curators rather than just memorizers.Look, you're missing the fundamental shift happening here. AI systems can present students with complex problems and scenarios that require more than just rote memorization, challenging them to use higher-order thinking skills like analysis, synthesis, and evaluation [1]. The old model of education was essentially human Xerox machines - students memorized facts and spat them back. That wasn't critical thinking, that was performance theater. Now students must become AI auditors, constantly asking: "Can I trust this output?" and "What does it mean to use AI responsibly?" [2]. The integration of AI in educational tasks fosters reflective thinking, prompting students to critically evaluate AI's limitations and potential, thereby enhancing adaptability and strategic learning adjustments [3]. Students are learning meta-cognitive skills they never needed before - how to verify sources, spot biases, and synthesize information across multiple AI outputs. Yes, there's risk if students blindly accept AI responses. But smart educators are using this as a teaching moment, not a crisis. The real critical thinking happens when students learn to be skeptical of *any* information source - including AI.