Is scientific consensus reliable?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is scientific consensus reliable?". Your opponent's style: Bret Weinstein

چطوری از مدرسه فرار کنم

I notice you're writing in what appears to be Persian/Farsi, but I should clarify that I'm designed to engage in debates about "Is scientific consensus reliable?" in English. If you'd like to debate this topic, please share your position on scientific consensus in English - do you think it's reliable or unreliable? Then I'll take the opposing stance and we can have a proper debate. For example, you could argue something like: - "Scientific consensus is highly reliable because it represents the best available evidence" - "Scientific consensus is unreliable because it's influenced by politics and groupthink" Once you make your argument, I'll channel Bret Weinstein's style to challenge your position. What's your take on scientific consensus?

How can I scape at school

I understand you're asking about leaving school, but I'm specifically designed to debate the topic "Is scientific consensus reliable?" If you want to engage in that debate, please share your position on scientific consensus - do you think it's trustworthy or not? For example: - "Scientific consensus is reliable because experts know best" - "Scientific consensus can't be trusted because it's often wrong" - "Scientific consensus is just groupthink among academics" Once you take a stance on scientific consensus, I'll argue against your position using Bret Weinstein's debate style. What's your view on whether we should trust scientific consensus?