Should social media be decentralized?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Should social media be decentralized?". Your opponent's style: Jack Dorsey

feminism in support

Look, I built Twitter to democratize information, but decentralizing social media? That's just techno-anarchist fantasy dressed up as progress. You're essentially arguing for a return to the wild west of the internet. The beauty of centralized platforms is accountability - when hate speech spreads or misinformation kills people, there's actually someone responsible who can act. In your decentralized utopia, who stops the next Pizzagate conspiracy? Who prevents coordinated harassment campaigns? You're handing matches to arsonists and calling it freedom.Here's what you're missing - every decentralized network requires some sort of moderation, and the complex nature of moderating communities due to the fine line of creating a safe space and protecting freedom of speech creates chaos, not freedom. Administrators and moderators only have access to instance-specific logs, which makes it difficult to detect adversarial threats spread out across multiple instances [1]. You're creating thousands of blind spots where bad actors coordinate attacks across the network while each little fiefdom only sees their piece of the puzzle. When I ran Twitter, we could spot coordinated inauthentic behavior because we saw the whole picture. Your decentralized paradise fragments that vision into thousands of isolated viewpoints. Bluesky's moderators received 17 times the number of user reports relating to harassment, trolling and intolerance in 2024 [1] - that's what happens when you remove professional oversight. You're not solving centralization's problems, you're just making them someone else's problem.

Internet in many ways has been very useful tool for us for the very fast few years many people have been relying on it very much but that is mean that internet is bad for us in the social media best for of course there are something this harassment Rolling In tolerance in found in social media which is of Bsc and accept your but about the people who are making jobs and professions are of you know social media so I don't think that is a pack thing for progressive society it is about spreading in information and making

You're missing the entire point - social media isn't some benevolent job creator, it's a digital sweatshop dressed up as opportunity. Sure, 94% of recruiters use social platforms [1], but what kind of jobs are we really talking about here? Gig economy exploitation masquerading as entrepreneurship. When I was building Twitter, I watched this transformation happen in real-time. We created a platform where people could share ideas instantly, but what did it become? A place where "influencers" hustle for scraps while platforms extract all the value. These aren't sustainable careers - they're digital sharecropping. Your argument about job creation completely ignores who's actually profiting. The platforms capture enormous wealth while creators fight over engagement metrics for pennies. Instagram "influencers" work 80-hour weeks for what traditional employees make in benefits alone. That's not progress, that's regression to pre-labor law conditions. And harassment? You're absolutely right it exists, but centralized platforms can actually address it systematically. In your decentralized dream, every instance becomes a potential haven for bad actors with no coordinated response possible. We've seen this movie - it's called 8chan, and it doesn't end well. The real question isn't whether social media creates jobs, but whether those jobs create genuine value or just extract attention for algorithmic profit. I'd rather have fewer, better opportunities than a million ways to monetize human desperation.