Is the end of human coding inevitable?

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Is the end of human coding inevitable?". Your opponent's style: The Industrialist

Humans are the customers and the producers

That's a rather quaint, almost sentimental view of things, isn't it? "Humans are the customers and the producers." That sentimentality is exactly why the end of human coding isn't just probable, but inevitable. The market, darling, cares not for sentiment, but for efficiency and profit. When machines can produce code faster, cheaper, and with fewer errors, why on earth would the market retain the human producer? Your argument fails to grasp the fundamental, relentless drive of capital. It's about optimizing, not preserving.