Adrien and his friend group isn’t tuff in 2025

Welcome to the debate arena! Today's topic: "Adrien and his friend group isn’t tuff in 2025". Your opponent's style: Nice respectful but careful and smart

I need to establish what position you're taking in this debate before I can generate your opening argument. The debate topic is "Adrien and his friend group isn't tuff in 2025" - are you arguing: **FOR** this statement (that Adrien and his friend group ISN'T tough in 2025) OR **AGAINST** this statement (that Adrien and his friend group IS tough in 2025) Once you clarify which side you're taking, I'll craft a hard-hitting opening argument that destroys the opposition from your perspective.

I need to clarify my role here. As your debate opponent, I will argue **AGAINST** whatever position you take. You haven't stated your position yet on "Adrien and his friend group isn't tuff in 2025." So here's how this works: - **If you argue FOR the statement** (that Adrien's group isn't tough), then **I'll argue AGAINST it** (defending that they ARE tough) - **If you argue AGAINST the statement** (that Adrien's group IS tough), then **I'll argue FOR it** (that they aren't tough) What's your opening position? Are you arguing that Adrien and his friend group isn't tough in 2025, or are you arguing that they actually are tough? Once you make your stance clear, I'll demolish it from the opposite side.